|
|
Post by Mega248 on Apr 20, 2008 21:24:06 GMT -4
Let the title be a note to the PDs in terms of what they need to do with single #1 (although if "Paralyzer" can stay on this long, I guess "The Pretender" deserves to do the same).
|
|
|
|
Post by a Nick O! on Apr 21, 2008 4:19:55 GMT -4
Let the title be a note to the PDs in terms of what they need to do with single #1 (although if "Paralyzer" can stay on this long, I guess "The Pretender" deserves to do the same). Although PDs should ignore the rest of the line in the actual song: "Why'd you have to go and..." |
|
|
|
Post by crash46 on Jun 14, 2008 4:19:44 GMT -4
What a shocking development; the song stealthily moves into the bronze medal position.
The last two albums' third singles, "Low" and "DOA", became chart footnotes in the blink of an eye by comparison. How was that even possible? Are any of their singles from either album really that different from one another?
|
|
|
|
Post by Pipa on Jun 14, 2008 9:33:04 GMT -4
^ Wasn't "No Way Back" the last third single?
|
|
|
|
Post by a Nick O! on Jun 15, 2008 2:17:35 GMT -4
^ Wasn't "No Way Back" the last third single? That's probably what he meant. And no, Steve, they aren't. |
|
