|
|
Post by Mega248 on Apr 7, 2008 0:48:19 GMT -4
This doesn't even get a week or two in the top 30? Are you kidding me? This is just as good as "Crazy". Is radio that determined to make them one-hit wonders or something?
|
|
|
|
Post by crash46 on Apr 8, 2008 18:48:54 GMT -4
This doesn't even get a week or two in the top 30? Are you kidding me? This is just as good as "Crazy". Is radio that determined to make them one-hit wonders or something? It's good, but I don't know about it being as good as "Crazy", and it also lacks the across the board sureshot mass appeal throughout all formats like "Crazy". Still highly disappointing that barely anyone even gave it a chance. It was only a week after I first heard "Run" that I was already hearing that "Who's Gonna Save Your Soul" in stores. Three of them. That song is sweetness too. |
|
|
|
Post by a Nick O! on Apr 9, 2008 4:43:09 GMT -4
I, too, wish "Run" would've been given more of a chance, but their Alternative (rock) radio success was kind of a fluke to begin with. I just can't believe radio's giving up on it so soon.
|
|
|
|
Post by a Nick O! on Apr 21, 2008 4:00:58 GMT -4
And it would've stayed at #44 this week (I say it did), but Mediabase went ahead and sent it to recurrentland already.  |
|
sparta
Board Member
Big Ben
Posts: 139
|
Post by sparta on Apr 26, 2008 2:39:58 GMT -4
I don't understand how they take the liberty of changing up the recurrent rule. This song was a breath of fresh air for alternative and it's a shame it failed.
|
|
